| Membership Demographics |
|
|
|
|
Membership Profile by Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Profile by Age Range
|
| 1) 35-44 33% |
| 2) 25-34 30% |
| 3) 45-54 23% |
| 4) 55+ 9% |
| 5) 15-24 5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Membership Profile by Affiliation
|
| 1) Faculty 52% |
| 2) Student 28% |
| 3) Other 17% |
| 4) Staff 3% |
|
|
|
|
| ll |
| Overall Satisfaction |
|
|
|
|
Overall Satisfaction
AVERAGE: 3.1
|
| Rated 1 thru 5 (best): |
| Rated 1 - 4% |
| Rated 2 - 12% |
| Rated 3 - 38% |
| Rated 4 - 38% |
| Rated 5 - 7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dues
AVERAGE: FINE
|
| Rated Low, Fine, High: |
| Rated LOW - 2% |
| Rated FINE - 88% |
| Rated HIGH - 10% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conference
AVERAGE: 3.0
|
| Rated 1 thru 5 (best): |
| Rated 1 - 8% |
| Rated 2 - 12% |
| Rated 3 - 32% |
| Rated 4 - 40% |
| Rated 5 - 8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conference Selections (Acceptances)
AVERAGE 3.2
|
| Rated 1 thru 5 (best): |
| Rated 0 - 35% * |
| Rated 1 to 2 - 39% |
| Rated 3 to 4 - 16% |
| Rated 5 - 10% |
|
|
|
| ll |
Overall Satisfaction Rating Breakdown:
|
|
|
Journal - 2.9
Newsletter - 3.0
Website - 2.9
CD Series - 3.4
Info about SEAMUS - 3.1
Admin Structure - 3.5
Opportunities for Input - 3.0
|
|
| ll |
| Conference Rating Breakdown |
|
|
Overall - 3.2
Conference Papers - 3.2
Student Commission - 3.1
Conference Music - 2.8
Panel Discussions - 3.0
CD Selection Process - 2.9
Cost of Attendance - 2.9
|
|
| * - ratings of 0 (offscale on the low end) were calculated by responses of 0 or none |
